Communism and Hunger Conference:
The Soviet, Kazakh, Ukrainian and Chinese Famines in Comparative Perspective
Toronto, September 26–27, 2014
Organized by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta and
the Petro Jacyk Program Centre for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at the Munk School, University of Toronto
*Note the availability of stipends for graduate students/early career scholars, see below.
Presenters: Lucien Bianco, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris: Famine in the USSR and China; Sarah Cameron, University of Maryland: Famine in the USSR and Kazakhstan; Andrea Graziosi, National Agency for the Evaluation of University and Research, Italy:Famine in the USSR, the Holodomor, China; Niccolò Pianciola, Lingnan University, Hong Kong: Famine in the USSR and Kazakhstan, China; Nicolas Werth, Institut d’histoire du temps présent, Paris: Famine in the USSR, Holodomor, China; Zhou Xun, University of Essex, UK: Chinese Famine Discussants: Olga Andriewsky, Trent University; Kimberly Manning, Concordia University
Over the past two decades, research on the great political famines of the twentieth century has made significant progress. Thanks to increased access to formerly closed archives and the collective efforts of the international scholarly community, we now have a more or less accurate picture of the causes, dynamics, demographic impact and consequences of the pan-Soviet famine of 1931–1933, the Ukrainian Holodomor, the Kazakh great hunger and the terrible famine in China produced by the Great Leap Forward in 1959–1961.
While there have been attempts at comparing these events, a systematic undertaking that could reveal both affinities and differences, and thus produce a deeper understanding of these phenomena, has yet to be attempted. Thiscomparative approach is warranted by the fact that all of these famines were the direct by-product of major “leaps forward” unleashed by Communist parties endowed with centralized planning mechanisms whose targets and priorities they believed could be controlled and freely manipulated. As well, in both the Soviet and the Chinese cases, these parties were led by powerful, quasi-despotic figures prepared to use any means and to profit from any circumstance to preserve power, often presenting themselves as the sole guarantor for the accomplishment of higher missions. Whatever the economic motivations, these famines were also political events that require political analyses of their causes and courses.
There were also major differences: semi-colonial mechanisms and the national question played a much more important role in the USSR than in China; the Chinese party was able to oppose its leader’s choices much more effectively than its Soviet counterpart; the geographical specificities of the famines seem to have had quite different causes; and while the Soviet famines allowed Stalin’s policies to triumph, the Chinese famine ended in a major defeat for Mao. Also, the aftermaths were substantially different, as demonstrated by an even superficial comparison between the Soviet show trials and the Great Proletarian Revolution.
The conference will bring together some of the best specialists of the Soviet, Ukrainian, Kazakh and Chinese famines, who, on the basis of their research and knowledge of the rapidly increasing specialized literature, will assess the common features and most significant differences of these famines and place their findings within the dynamics of the histories of the respective countries.
For more information, contact HREC: email@example.com; 416 923-4732; www.holodomor.ca / www.ualberta.ca/CIUS/
STIPENDS TOWARD CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
The Holodomor Research and Education Consortium (HREC) of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (University of Alberta) announces the availability of stipends to graduate students and early career scholars to attend the conference Communism and Hunger: The Soviet, Kazakh, Ukrainian and Chinese Famines in Comparative Perspective, in Toronto, September 26–27, 2014. The stipends are intended to allow participants to deepen their knowledge of these twentieth-century political famines by learning from and engaging with leading experts. Presenting at the conference are Lucien Bianco, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris; Sarah Cameron, University of Maryland; Andrea Graziosi, National Agency for the Evaluation of University and Research, Italy; Niccolò Pianciola, Lingnan University, Hong Kong; Nicolas Werth, Institut d’histoire du temps présent, Paris: and Zhou Xun, University of Essex, UK. Olga Andriewsky, Trent University, and Kimberly Manning, Concordia University, will serve as discussants. A document outlining the conference concept can be found at: www.holodomor.ca and www.ualberta.ca/CIUS/
Applicants from North America are eligible for stipends of $500 to defray the cost of attending; stipends of up to $750 will be awarded to successful applicants from outside North America.
Eligibility: Applicant must be a graduate student or have defended a PhD within the past three years. Applicant must commit to attending the conference in its entirety.
To apply, please submit:
1. A statement (500-750 words), indicating how you meet the criteria and answering the questions:
What do you hope to gain through attending? How would attendance support your research interests, teaching and/or career plans?
2. Current curriculum vitae/resume.
3. A letter of support from an advisor or professor.
Please submit by June 2, 2014, via email to firstname.lastname@example.org ; please use subject line: Conference Stipend.