• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
UT Shield
The University of Texas at Austin
  • Bios

Forests

May 6, 2024, Filed Under: Forests

Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon & the Role of Carbon Markets

The Amazon Rainforest is an invaluable resource not only to Brazil, but to the world as one of the planet’s major carbon sinks. However, in recent years, rapid deforestation poses a major threat to the Amazon and its climate-stabilizing abilities.

Can carbon markets help to address the issue of deforestation in the Amazon?

The Amazon

  • Resources
    • “Lungs of the Earth:” the Amazon is produces 20% of oxygen generated from land-based photosynthesis (Source)
    • It is home to 400-500 indigenous tribes. (Source)
    • The Amazon generates an estimated US$317 billion at least annually, (Source)
    • and contributes to approximately 10% of Brazils GDP. (Source)
    • Its wildlife has immense research and medical value. (Source)
  • Biodiversity
    • The Amazon is home to:
    • 40,000 plant species,
    • 3,000 fish species,
    • 1,300 bird species,
    • 430 mammal species
    • 2.5 million insect species
    • Many endangered of which are endangered
    • (Source)
  • Climate
    • Carbon Sink: The Amazon currently takes in and stores more than 150 billion [metric] tons of carbon. (Source)

Deforestation

“Over the past 40 years, 20% of the Amazon Rainforest has already been cut down”

One Tree Planted
  • The leading driver of deforestation both globally and in Brazil is cattle ranching. (Source)
  • Almost all deforestation in the Amazon is unlawful, resulting from illegal ranching, mining, and logging. (Source)
  • Deforestation increased under the administration of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, which cut resources for environmental protection. (Source)

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva & Brazilian government restore pledge to “halt deforestation completely by 2028.”

Financial Times

Deforestation also generates emissions…

  • Brazil is the 5th largest emitter of CO2 in the world
  • Deforestation and agriculture account for 70% of Brazil’s emissions.
  • 50% of emissions come from deforestation alone.
  • (Source)

This means to meet Brazil’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) of a 37% reduction of CO2 emissions by 2025, and a 43% reduction by 2030, Brazil must focus on reducing deforestation.

“Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has said he will do ‘whatever it takes to have zero deforestation.’”

Financial Times

Carbon Markets

To help address this issue, Brazil could turn to carbon markets.

How Do Carbon Markets Work?

  • Creating Credits: Projects that reduce CO2 would earn tradable permits/credits/offsets.
  • Forests & Credits: Projects that focus on reforestation, forest protection, etc. could sell credits since they reduce carbon by maintaining a carbon sink and reducing carbon released from deforestation.
  • Creating Demand for Projects: Polluters who cannot meet emissions goals must purchase offsets, generating demand for these carbon credits. By allowing beneficial forest projects to generate credits, demand for projects that focus on forest protection and/or rehabilitation is also generated.

Recently, lawmakers in Brazil have introduced legislation that would establish a national cap-and-trade system, in which the government would set a “cap,” or “upper limit,” to the amount of CO2 emissions an entity could produce. If entities cannot reduce their emissions to this amount, they will need to purchase carbon permits/credits/offsets. (Source)

Brazil hopes that by tapping into both compliance carbon markets, and voluntary carbon markets (VCM), an estimated $120bn could be brought to Brazil’s economy. (Source)

Potential Problems

  • Greenwashing: Skepticism has emerged around carbon credits, as recent reporting has shown that projects often do not generate the benefits they claim to. Studies have shown that only between 10% to 30% of credits traded on the Voluntary Carbon Market are delivering their claimed impact. (Source)
  • Agriculture Exemptions: Concerns have also emerged around Brazil’s proposed cap-and-trade system due to exemptions made for agriculture; one of the leading drivers of deforestation and one of the largest sources of CO2 emissions in Brazil. (Source)

Here is how various actors can address this issue:

States: Brazilian Government

  • Establish Cap-and-Trade system
    • Establishing a compliance market will force polluters who cannot meet emissions targets to buy credits, driving demand for positive forest projects that generate credits.
  • Create and enforce standards and regulations around Forest projects
    • The Brazilian government would tightly regulate which projects take place and where, and should continue to work to enforce environmental protections. 
  • Work with IOs & Private Actors to ensure quality of credits
    • Governments can help identify areas of priority for projects, and should work with private actors and IOs in establishing proper verification measures.
  • Continue setting national goals related to Forest and Climate
    • Setting goals like halting deforestation and NDCs drive national policies that promote forest protection.
  • Explore other non-market options; such as Indigenous land tenure
    • Indigenous land tenure has shown to be effective in increasing forest cover. The Brazilian government should work to promote policies that award Indigenous communities land tenure in the Amazon.

Private Actors

  • Demand side offset buyers should purchase offsets strictly from projects using advanced baseline calculation methodologies such as…
    • “Dynamic baseline,” which uses new technologies such as remote sensing, high-resolution satellite imagery, machine learning, LiDAR, artificial intelligence and real-time data transmission to improve project monitoring
    • Jurisdiction REDD+, which represents a new generation of forestry projects that uses jurisdictional forestry data to issue credits in ways that help prevent leakage

International Organizations: UNEP

  • Set a common standard for evaluating and monitoring carbon credits.
  • Work with communities and states to discover new opportunities to prevent deforestation.
  • Facilitate transfers of carbon credits between states and private actors.
  • Become a global, central authority on carbon credits to ensure long run validity.

Conclusion

The market for carbon credits in its current state is not going to achieve the goals we would like to see regarding deforestation unless it undergoes significant changes. However, steps can be taken to address this issue. States can continue setting national goals on deforestation, establish a cap and trade system, enforce standards related to deforestation, and work with IOs and local communities to identify priority conservation/reforestation areas. Additionally, Brazil can explore non-market options, such as Indigenous land tenure which has shown to effectively increase forest cover. International Organizations can become a central authority on carbon credits by setting a common standard, facilitating trades/transfers of credits, and working with states and locals to ensure credits are only being created based on at-risk areas. Private actors can come together to set industry standards, such as purchasing offsets strictly from projects using advanced baseline calculation methodologies. Alternatively, private actors can contribute to an international climate finance fund, such as the Green Climate Fund, to help developing tropical nations reach their nationally determined contributions.

Learn More:

Recent news:

  • The Financial Times: Brazil to launch regulated carbon market
  • The New York Times: Can Forests Be More Profitable Than Beef?

Posted on May 6, 2024 by: Brandon Mulder, Cody Steverson & Kate McCarroll

May 11, 2021, Filed Under: Forests

Saving the Rainforests of Southeast Asia

A plan to save the forests

The majority of the world’s tropical rainforests that act as the lungs of the world are located around the equator in South America, Western Africa, and Southeast Asian.  The rainforests of Borneo are critical to efforts to combat climate change and are at the center of efforts to combat climate change.

The island of Borneo is a large, densely forested landmass north of the island of Java and east of peninsular Malaysia. The countries of Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia occupy the island all contribute to the deforestation problem.

Geographic Location of Borneo in Southeast Asia

Borneo has lost over 50% of its forests since 1950 as human development, the lumber industry, and palm oil plantations have taken over. This deforestation has accelerated with time and the COVID-19 pandemic has not caused a corresponding drop in deforestation like global emissions. The economic insecurity caused by COVID-19 will only encourage further deforestation in the name of economic growth.

Tree Cover Lost: 1950-2020

The deforestation trends were particularly vulnerable to palm oil prices that were high in the early 2010s. Palm oil plantations rapidly increased their deforestation efforts from 2005 to 2020. This deforestation effort largely followed the price of palm oil, which has recently doubled from its pre-pandemic low.

Global Palm Oil Price in Malaysian Ringgit per Ton

To make matters worse, the Indonesian government recently announced that it intends to move its capital from Jakarta on the island of Java to the province of East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo. This move has been reported to involve shifting at least 1 million people from Jakarta to Borneo, possibly causing the pollution and urban sprawl of Jakarta to come to Borneo.

Pollution in Jakarta

Counter the Palm Oil and Lumber Industries – Create a Global or Regional Rainforest Economic Fund

The biggest factor in deforestation of Borneo is economic insecurity. President Biden’s proposal for a $20 billion Amazon Rainforest fund needs a tailored equivalent for Southeast Asia. This fund would counter economic incentives to cut down rainforests for palm oil or lumber.

Implement government-to-government carbon trading on a larger scale. 

Similar to a rainforest economic fund. This system of carbon trading would allow countries outside of Borneo to fund conservation efforts in exchange for their equivalent carbon sink offset. This would help shift the island of Borneo to largely a carbon sink from slash-and-burn palm oil plantations and industrial logging, to a conservation environmental sink.

You can make a Difference – Reduce your Palm Oil Consumption

Palm Oil is used in everyday items such as: vegetable oil, biodiesel, and skin products. Consumers can reduce the incentive for palm oil plantations to cut trees down by cutting down or removing these products from their lives.

May 10, 2021, Filed Under: Climate, Forests

Brazil’s Beef with the Amazon

As domestic conservation prospects for the Amazon rainforest grow dim, the international community must address Brazil’s most damaging industry.

The deforestation of the Amazon rainforest has been a prevalent topic among conservation policy and advocacy groups since the 1970s. Brazil, home to 60% of the Amazon’s 2.6 million square miles of rainforest, has always the focus of conservation efforts. For decades, the catastrophic deforestation of Brazil’s rainforest seemed inevitable. Perspectives began to change in the early 2010s when deforestation rates in Brazil began to decrease drastically, with a 70% decline in the annual rate by 2012 compared to 2005 rates.  

This decline in deforestation has been tied directly to the successful implementation and enforcement of new policies and interventions in Brazil’s soy and beef supply chains. But protecting the Amazon is a continual process, a process that Brazil’s President Bolsonaro has systematically dismantled since he took office in January 2019.  

Starting early in his term, Bolsonaro has promoted the expansion of industrial projects in the Amazon, worked to overturn environmental laws, limited funding to Brazil’s environmental protection agency, and made efforts to dismantle the system of protections and land rights afforded to Indigenous communities by Brazil’s Constitution. In conglomerate, these measures have resulted in the accelerated deforestation of the Amazon, with the 2020 deforestation rate coming in at nearly 2.5 times that of 2012. Bolsonaro’s actions have not only given legal avenues for industry to cut down larger swaths of the Amazon, but his administration’s inaction on policing protected forests has resulted in increasing illegal land seizures and deforestation.  

Though an array of farming and industrial activities has contributed to the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, the country’s growing beef industry has long been the leading driver of deforestation, both legal and illegal. Brazil is the world’s largest exporter of beef products, exporting a reported a record-setting 2.02 million metric tons in 2020. The reported revenue from this trade is $8.4 billion. While both the domestic and export markets for Brazil’s beef are an important part of the Brazilian economy, the industry has come at a steep price for the country’s vital rainforest, the loss of which has wider ramifications for both the regional and global climate, as well as biodiversity. 

Data released in 2019 by Trase, a deforestation and commodities monitoring platform, shows how damaging the demand for beef has been for the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Every year an estimated 260,000 to 580,000 hectares of the Amazon rainforest is cleared due to expanding cattle ranching. From 1988 to 2014, 63% of the area deforested in Brazil became cattle pastureland. Between the forest loss and the gasses emitted from the cattle during digestion, Brazil’s beef industry is responsible for around half of the country’s greenhouse emissions.  

According to Trase, over two-thirds of the country’s cattle-related deforestation risk comes from Brazil’s top three beef exporters, JBS, Minerva, and Marfrig. Separate investigations by the NGOs Amnesty International and Global Witness have linked all three companies to cattle ranches where illegal deforestation has occurred. According to a 2020 study, it is estimated that least 17% of Brazilian beef exports are linked to illegal deforestation due to improper monitoring of beef supply chains. 

Brazil’s beef industry is not only disastrous for the Amazon rainforest and global decarbonization efforts, but it has also limited Brazil’s economic potential. Many rural farmers operating in the Amazon have continued to ranch cattle, even though they could make more money – and protect the Amazon from further degradation – by growing acai or oranges. However, social preferences and lagging supply chain infrastructure in Brazil’s rural regions has kept industry tied to low-income and highly environmentally damaging cattle farming.  

What can be done?  

Although previous evidence indicates that domestic policy and enforcement can go far in decreasing the beef industry’s impact on deforestation, the Bolsonaro administration is unlikely to adopt the measures necessary to do so. In the continued absence of domestic action against deforestation in Brazil, there are steps individuals, businesses, investors, and other states’ policymakers can take to protect the Amazon and disincentivize illegal deforestation related to cattle farming. 

One of the best ways to protect the Brazilian rainforest is to decrease demand for Brazilian beef. Both individuals and companies should work to either cut their purchase of Brazilian beef, or else more carefully monitor the supply chain of the Brazilian companies they do purchase from. Both should avoid beef exported by JBS, Minerva, or Marfrig until these companies take more credible commitments to eliminate all links to illegal deforestation. Decreasing the consumption of beef from Brazil will also decrease deforestation caused by another major industry contributing to the deforestation of the Amazon – soy farming. Much of the soy farmed in Brazil is used to make cheap protein-rich feed for cows. If less beef is consumed, fewer cattle will be farmed, and less rainforest will be cutdown for soy farms.  

Another powerful tool to influence change could be through trade sanctions. Much of the illegal deforestation in the Amazon is a result of the absence of punitive measures under Bolsonaro’s administration. If Brazil’s major beef importers set trade barriers and restrictions on Brazilian beef exporters tied to illegal cattle farms, they could fill this gap, changing the incentives of Brazil’s rural farmers.  

Investors can help conservation efforts by investing in the processing, storage, and marketing infrastructure necessary to move Brazil’s agriculture industry away from the low-income and environmentally damaging cattle farming to more sustainable and profitable agricultural industries.  


Rachel Gossett

May 10, 2021, Filed Under: Forests

Saving the Amazon – We did it before and we can do it again

Jaguar (Panthera onca) peeking out through foliage and flowers, Amazon, Brazil. Claus Meyer/Minden Pictures

In recent years, we have witnessed devastating footage of the Amazon on fire. Rising temperatures and deforestation are a few drivers. With climate change presenting an existential crisis, it is easy to feel overwhelmed or hopeless. How can we reverse the damage done to this incredible habitat? Why should we?


THE AMAZON IS BIG, BEAUTIFUL, & ESSENTIAL

The Amazon forest covers over 6 million square kilometers and spans eight territories and countries – Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana. Brazil is home to the largest portion of the Amazon, containing roughly 60% of the forest. The Amazon’s ecosystem is wonderfully diverse. There are about 40,000 species of plants, 1,300 species of birds, 3,000 varieties of fish, over 400 types of mammals, about 2.5 million different insects. Importantly, the Amazon forest is a big player in climate change mitigation. The forest is responsible for absorbing huge amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, acting as a “carbon sink.” Globally, forests capture over 7 billion metric tons of carbon yearly, and the Amazon accounts for about a quarter of that total. In other words, the Amazon absorbs about 5% of annual carbon dioxide emissions, giving it an important function in the effort to reduce carbon emissions and help realize the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement.


FOREST UNDER FIRE

As you may be aware, the Amazon rainforest is under attack. Brazilian President, Jair Bolsonaro, steward of the largest portion of the Amazon, has weakened environmental protections and environmental law enforcement in the forest. The deforestation rate in Brazil was on the rise before Bolsonaro but has surged since he assumed office at the start of 2019. In 2020, the Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate reached a ten-year high, with an estimated forest loss of about 11,088 square kilometers. Deforestation has numerous ramifications including soil erosion, crop loss, flooding, loss of biodiversity, an increase in greenhouse gases, and an increase in wildfires.

In 2020, the Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate reached a ten-year high, with an estimated forest loss of about 11,088 square kilometers

—

Scientists from IPAM Amazonia, a Brazilian research group, linked the fires in the Amazon directly to deforestation. Municipalities with the most fire outbreaks also have the highest deforestation rates. The main drivers of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon are cattle-ranching, commodity demand, and logging. Cattle-ranchers set fires to fertilize the soil and clear brush for new land for the cattle to graze on. Other commodities, such as soybeans, also play a driving role in Brazilian deforestation. Brazil is the world’s number one exporter of beef and soybeans, both of which require large amounts of land. While Brazil’s main beef customer is China, the United States imports increasingly more beef from Brazil. In 2020, the U.S. imported nearly 30 million pounds of beef from Brazil, an increase of over 10 million pounds from the previous year. As pro-business ruralistas have gained power in the Brazilian congress, agriculture and business interests get prioritized over environmental concerns.


SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATION EFFORTS

Before the recent rise in deforestation rates in Brazil, the country was managing to steadily decrease the rate of Amazonian deforestation. From 2004 through 2012, the annual forest loss in Brazil declined by roughly 80%, reaching a low of about 4,500 square kilometers that year. The decrease in deforestation is a result of domestic policies as well as environmental activism, private and public sector initiatives, and international pressure. In 2003, the Brazilian government implemented a four-phase Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAm). The PPCDAm played a large role in significantly cutting the deforestation rate in Brazil. This initiative expanded the protected land areas in Brazil, improved remote monitoring via satellites, and increased law enforcement in the forestry sector. These efforts saw great results, halving the deforestation rate in Brazil from 2004 to 2007.  When deforestation rates slightly rose again in 2008, the Brazilian government identified and made public a list of municipalities that were the worst deforestation offenders. Law enforcement efforts were then targeted at these municipalities. In addition, the Brazilian government required environmental compliance in order for landowners to qualify for government-subsidized agricultural credit. Together, these efforts helped Brazil reach an 80% reduction in deforestation from 2004 to 2012.


RETURNING TO CONSERVATION

What worked before can work again. We as private citizens can work with NGOs and civil society groups to apply international pressure on the Brazilian government to re-implement and strengthen the PPCDAm action plan. Brazil should halt and then limit commodity-driven deforestation efforts, enforce environmental laws, and respect and protect indigenous lands.

We must apply pressure on the Brazilian government to re-implement and strengthen the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon

—

As an individual, eat locally sourced beef when possible. Even better, reduce your beef consumption. As a consumer, you can choose to support “rainforest safe” products. For example, look for the “Rainforest Alliance Certified” logo. You can also support organizations working to protect the Amazon such as Amazon Watch, Amazon Conservation Team, and the Rainforest Trust. Find more organizations here. And of course, find organizations or initiatives in your city that work for environmental conservation and protection. Get to know your local elected officials and learn more about what they are doing to protect the environment.


May 10, 2021, Filed Under: Forests

Fighting Climate Change & Biodiversity Loss through Reforestation

The world is rapidly losing vital forest cover. The Food and Agriculture Organization estimates over 50 million hectares of forest were lost globally between 2000 and 2010.

Forests are a valuable tool against climate change because they absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As a result, land-use changes, like deforestation, can significantly increase global carbon levels. Strong evidence points to agricultural expansion as the main cause of deforestation in tropical regions: 83% of agriculture expansion between 1980 and 2000 was into forests. Emissions from agriculture-driven deforestation is highest in Latin America at 78%. Latin America contains only a quarter of the world’s forests. However, its rates of deforestation are significantly higher than world averages. In 2019, the tropics lost the equivalent of a football field of tree cover every six seconds the entire year.

Deforestation also imperils global biodiversity. Rainforests in the tropics are some of the most biologically diverse places on the planet. Their species diversity is a “gigantic repository” of biological diversity and genetic resources for humans.

According to the World Resources Institute, conserving existing forests could cut carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by an estimated seven billion metric tons annually – equivalent to getting rid of every car currently on the planet.

Fortunately, interventions to reduce deforestation have found success. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation+ (REDD+) is a results-based program for reducing deforestation by paying countries to conserve forests. REDD+ programs help developing countries address deforestation by providing better understanding of deforestation drivers, improving forest monitoring capacities, and increasing stakeholder engagement.

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization

REDD+ not only conserves forests, but aids developing countries with financial assistance. REDD+ initiatives found success in Indonesia, reducing forest loss in 2018 and 2019. REDD+ also helped facilitate important forestry policies in Guyana. However, the program sometimes fails to adequately address illegal logging or the conversion of forest for agricultural production.

Intensifying agriculture is another possible remedy to tropical deforestation. Innovative land use management while considering developing countries’ economic needs can conserve tropical forests, empower smallholder farmers, and alleviate global food insecurity. A systemic approach looks to increase agricultural productivity by enhancing farming methods, natural resource management, and smallholder farmer livelihoods. Complex agroecosystems can help absorb climate shocks and disease epidemics.

Although deforestation around the world increased rapidly over the past few decades, Costa Rica provides a model for success. Costa Rica had one of the highest deforestation rates in the 1980s. It is now considered a model of environmental sustainability. 

Source: Mongabay

Costa Rica has intensified agriculture and forestry in recent years, with agricultural production concentrated on the most suitable land. Encouraging other tropical regions to displace their land use needs to developed countries can prevent deforestation. Forests in developed countries are typically less biologically diverse, and maintenance is more easily facilitated. Costa Rica is now a major producer of bananas and pineapples, and its forests have transitioned to net-reforestation rates.

May 8, 2021, Filed Under: Climate, Forests, Lead Story, Oceans/Fisheries, Wildlife

30 x 30: Protecting 30% of our land and ocean by 2030

By Holly Sarkissian

The Problem: Not enough has been done to protect the biodiversity of our land and sea

Plant and animal species are going extinct at an alarming rate, putting the earth is on track to a mass extinction unless immediate action is taken. Amphibians are the world’s most endangered animals with half of the species at risk of extinction and many other creatures are facing extinction, including:

Source: https://www.campaignfornature.org/
  • One-third of corals, freshwater mollusks, sharks, and rays
  • One-fourth of mammals
  • One-fifth of reptiles 
  • One-sixth of birds

We have already lost 90% of big ocean fish in the last century and 60% of terrestrial wildlife in the last 50 years due to deforestation and land degradation. Although the Ocean covers 70% of the Earth, only 2% is strongly protected from destructive or extractive activities. At the same time, only 15% of land is protected.

Why is protecting the land and ocean important?

The degradation of land and ocean endangers our health, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and countless livelihoods.

Safeguarding human health: 75% of emerging infectious disease comes from animals. Displacing animals from their habitats increases the likelihood they will be pushed into areas inhabited by humans and risk transmitting zoonotic diseases. Scientists believe that the origins of the recent Ebola and COVID-19 epidemics are linked to human interactions with animals which were displaced from their original habitat.

The importance of the ocean: The ocean is home to 80% of all life on the planet. It is estimate that the ocean absorbs 30% of the excess carbon dioxide emissions and over 90% of the heat from global warming. It is the largest provider of protein in the world, sustaining 3 billion people who eat seafood as their primary source of protein. The ocean also contributes to ~$1.5 trillion USD in global economic activity and supports more than $39 billion USD annually from maritime and tourism activities alone.

Sea Turtle and Dolphin in the Ocean
Source: World Animal Foundation

What is the solution?

Scientists warn that we must protect at least 30% of our oceans, lands, rivers, lakes, and wetlands by 2030 to prevent mass extinctions and bolster resilience to climate change. By 2050, scientists say we need half of the planet in its natural state to prevent the extinction of one million species, stay below 1.5°C global warming, and safeguard all people that rely on nature to survive and thrive.

The initiative to protect 30% of our land and oceans by 2030, known as 30×30, will help give us a chance to maintain global biodiversity. We have seen that when areas are protected wildlife comes back:

  • Wolves in the U.S.: After being extinct for 70 years, wolves were successfully reintroduced to Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) in the 1990s. Since then, research has found that wolf recovery leads to greater biodiversity in the region as wolves prey on elk and the elk caucuses provide food to other animals.
  • Large Mammals in Rwanda: In the aftermath of war and genocide, Rwanda’s wildlife in Akagera National Park began to disappear; the lions were gone by 2002 and the last black rhino was seen in 2007. But in 2009 the big 5 (leopards, lions, Cape buffalo, elephants, and rhinoceros) were reintroduced to the park and now their populations are rebounding.
The big 5 (leopards, lions, Cape buffalo, elephants, and rhinoceros) in Akagera National Park
  • Rhinos in India and Nepal: By the early 19th century there were fewer than 200 greater one-horned rhinos. However, with protection from Indian and Nepalese wildlife authorities in national parks their numbers have grown to around 3,600 today. 

Similar successes have been observed in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs):

  • Fish in Cabo Pulmo National Marine Park, California, U.S.: Studies found that the total amount of fish biomass in this MPA increased by 460% from 1999 to 2009.
  • Species Diversity and Fish in Apo Island Marine Sanctuary, Philippines: The biomass of large predatory fish have increased 8-fold and the biomass and diversity of species has increased in the reserve overall.
Source: Lonely Planet

What can governments do?

Make the 30×30 commitment: Governments must commit to preserving at least 30% of their country’s oceans and land by 2030 with a focus on areas more important for biodiversity and on indigenous-controlled lands. 37% of Earth’s remaining natural lands are managed by indigenous peoples who, in some cases, must risk their lives to stand up against poachers and others who encroach on their land for illegal resource extraction or degradation activities.  Furthermore, scientific studies indicate that Indigenous peoples and local communities are usually more effective at implementing conservation than government-funded agencies.

Bring 30×30 to the international stage: As part of the 2010 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) negotiations world leaders committed to protecting 17% of land and 10% of the ocean by 2020. A 2020 report concluded that from 2010-2019, the percentage of the Earth’s surface covered by protected areas increased from 14.1% to 15.3% on land, and from 2.9% to 7.5% in the ocean, falling short of previous CBD commitments. Now world leaders must not only strive to meet their 2020 targets as soon as possible but they also must increase their ambition and commit to global biodiversity targets of 30 x 30 or greater at the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 15) to the CBD taking place in November 2021.

Strategic Implementation of 30×30: It is not enough for our leaders to make this commitment on paper, the must then take action to implement 30×30 strategically:

Source: Boreal Conservation
  1. Consider representation – Ideally, protection efforts will encompass a broad representation of species and ecosystems i.e., a little bit of everything. Leaders must preserve this variety when implementing their 30×30 commitments and not just conserve barren rock or ice.
  2. Prioritize intact ecosystems – Intact wilderness provides huge benefits for carbon sequestration, resilience, and species persistence.
  3. Invest in indigenous initiatives – Many of these important wildness areas lie on indigenous lands. These communities need support and protection.
  4. Fund Protection – Once a commitment has been made it is not enough to leave these areas untouched, these areas must also be monitored, studied, and managed for the best results. Such action requires resources and world leaders must ensure there is a national budget line to fund protection.
  5. Protect crucial ecosystems at risk of industrial development – We must guard key habitats against industrial anthropogenic impacts from forestry, mining, oil and gas, hydropower, and infrastructure in important ecosystems like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the Boreal Forest.
  6. Pair with efforts to reduce environmental degradation and pollution beyond the 30×30 areas – Our leaders must also strengthen the environmental protection of the remaining 70% of land and oceans.

Case of the U.S.

Source: New York Magazine

The U.S. has signed but not yet ratified CBD so it cannot directly participate in COP15. Nevertheless, the Biden-Harris Administration has committed to protecting 30 % of U.S. lands and waters by the year 2030. President Biden also stressed the importance of world leaders joining 30 x 30 during last month’s climate summit.

Today, only about 12% of America’s land area is under some type of environmental protection, while ~26% of the country’s ocean territories are protected. While the nation close to achieving the 30 x 30 goal offshore, getting to 30% on land will require environmental protections for a combined land area equal to twice the size of Texas.

To meet this challenge, the Biden-Harris Administration released a report on its “America the Beautiful” initiative for a 10-year, locally led and voluntary nationwide effort to restore and conserve America’s lands, waters, and wildlife. The report does not specify which lands will be conserved. It does, however, lay out the priorities for the beginning phase of the initiative which include supporting tribally led conservation and restoration, expanding collaborative conservation of fish and wildlife habitats and corridors, and incentivizing the voluntary conservation efforts of fishers, ranchers, farmers, and forest owners.

To combat climate change, the Biden-Harris Administration must incorporate maximizing carbon sequestration into its 30 x 30 strategy. According to a scientific study  in 2018, the U.S. could potentially sequester the equivalent of 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide annually by 2025, an amount that is equal to 21% of current net annual emissions of the United States. These scientists suggest strategies to enhance carbon capture including reforestation, better management of forests on private lands, protecting forests from conversion to other uses, protecting grasslands from conversion to cropland, and restoring tidal wetlands.

Global Country Commitments

In January 2021, 50 countries committed to protecting 30% of the world’s land and ocean by 2030 known as the high ambition coalition. By March 2021, 83 countries joined this commitment. The first 50 countries to sign on collectively control:

Source: High Ambition Coalition for Nature and People
  • 30% of global terrestrial biodiversity (using vertebrates as a proxy)
  • 25% of the world’s terrestrial carbon stores (biomass and soil)
  • 28% of ocean biodiversity priority areas
  • one-third of the ocean carbon stores

Now, other countries must join the 30×30 campaign and strategically implement their commitments.

What can Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) do?

NGOs have been critical in shaping and directing the international community’s response to global environmental challenges. They act as agitators for environmental action, architects of governance solutions, and entrepreneurs for new sorts of initiatives. They can also lobby governments and “name and shame” governments who are not living up to their commitments.

NGOs must push for global adoption of the 30×30 targets at COP15. At a country-level, NGOs can advocate for the adoption of the 30×30 target and push for its strategic and effective implementation, protecting the most important and intact ecosystems. They can support the science-based monitoring and management of protected areas. They can also advocate for the aid and protection of indigenous communities, so they are not displaced or subjected to violence by poachers and others engaging in illegal resource extraction.

NGOs are already building and strengthening transnational advocacy networks for 30 x 30. For example, the Campaign for Nature is a partnership of the Wyss Campaign for Nature, National Geographic Society, and a growing international coalition of 100+ conservation NGOs calling on policymakers to commit to protecting at least 30% of the planet by 2030 by agreeing on a science-driven, ambitious new deal for nature at COP-15. The coalition is lobbying world leaders to mobilize funding to manage protected areas and to integrate indigenous leadership into their biodiversity conservation approaches. They will be working behind the scenes at COP-15 to push world leaders to make ambitious 30 x 30 commitments.

What can businesses do?

Over half of the world’s GDP, $44 trillion of economic value, is at moderate or severe risk due to nature loss. Businesses must examine their potential to both help and harm the environment. On the negative side, businesses consume large quantities of natural resources and generate significant negative externalities such as waste and pollution. They must work to reduce their environmental impacts. On the positive side, businesses can wield private authority by creating standards or practices that other actors adopt.

A way to promote compliance from businesses is to engage them in a green club volunteer program like Business for Nature which promotes standards of conduct which produce public environmental benefits. In return, club members get exclusive benefits such as affiliation with the club’s positive brand name. Successful clubs induce members to take progressive environmental action beyond what they would have done unilaterally. According to the Nature for Business coalition, 530 businesses have committed to taking action to reverse nature loss and 1200 businesses are already taking action to reduce their negative impact on nature, invest in protecting and restoring nature, and scale up products and technologies to have a lower environmental impact.

For example, Kering, a French-based multinational corporation specialized in luxury goods, is working in partnership with the Wildlife Conservation Society and other partners to increase the sustainability of the cashmere industry in Mongolia. Increased world demand for cashmere has led to a surge in goat numbers in Mongolia and the increase in goat grazing has led to the degradation Mongolian grasslands. For this initiative, Kering is working with its local suppliers to leverage technology to improve the efficient of goat-combing and to monitor the pasture quality by satellite to better manage grazing. More businesses must join this effort to re-orient their strategies and supply chains to prevent additional nature loss.

Goats in Mongolia
Source: Business for Nature

What can you do?

  1. Call on your world leaders to commit to protecting 30% of the world’s land and oceans by 2030 and to incorporate that commitment into the agreed targets of Convention on Biodiversity at COP15.
  2. Stay up to date on current scientific and political developments and ensure that your government is implementing its commitments.
  3. Use your time and money to support initiatives by NGOs and businesses working towards the 30×30 commitments.

Pushing for 30×30 is key to addressing the climate and biodiversity crisis we face. We must join efforts to make sure our world leaders set ambitious land and ocean protection targets and work successfully to achieve them.


Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Legacy Page
  • The Paso del Norte Air Basin: opportunity and reward in a chronically polluted region
  • Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon & the Role of Carbon Markets
  • Four Strategies to Advance Equitable Climate Finance in the Developing World
  • Tourism: A Double-Edged Sword for Coral Reef Conservation

Categories

  • Air Pollution
  • Climate
  • Forests
  • Lead Story
  • Oceans/Fisheries
  • Uncategorized
  • Wildlife

UT Home | Emergency Information | Site Policies | Web Accessibility | Web Privacy | Adobe Reader

© The University of Texas at Austin 2025