• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
UT Shield
The University of Texas at Austin
  • Texas ScholarWorks
  • Texas Data Repository
  • OER LibGuide
  • Copyright LibGuide

October 28, 2024, Filed Under: OAWeek, Open access, Publishing

Open Access Business Models

As part of our OA Week 2024 celebrations, we hosted a discussion on October 23rd about various open access topics. I’ll be recapping those discussions here on the OA blog.

Today, I’ll share what we discussed related to open access business models.

There are many types of OA business models. I’ll summarize just a few.

  • Subscribe to Open (S2O): OA model that converts traditional subscription journals to open access one year at a time using existing library relationships and payments. Institutions subscribe in the traditional manner and when a target revenue is reached, the journal is published OA. If the revenue goals are not met, that year’s content stays subscription access only.
  • Diamond OA: Free immediately upon publication and with no charges to readers or authors. These journals are typically supported by volunteers and may have institutional or organizational funding to cover any publication costs.
  • Read and Publish: OA model that bundles payment for reading access and payment for publishing into a single contract. These are sometimes called transformative agreements. Frequently there is a limit on the number of articles that may be published OA, but some publishers are starting to offer an unlimited OA publication model that works much better for research intensive schools like UT.
  • Article processing charge (APC): A charge levied per article to cover the costs of publication. APCs can be charged for fully open access journals or for hybrid journals. In a hybrid journal, most of the content is available by subscription only, but authors have the option of paying an APC to make their one article OA. APCs can vary widely from just a $100-$200, up to more than $12,000 per article. This model shifts the access problem from readers to authors.
  • OA monograph models: Several models exist to support the publication of OA monographs. The most common models depend on getting enough libraries to pay a fee to cover the cost of publication of X number of monographs. Typically, the fee also includes access to a publisher’s backfile as an incentive to participate.\

Our group discussed some benefits associated with the different models:

  • Subscribe to Open (S2O) uses already established workflows which makes participating in the program really easy for libraries.
  • S2O avoids costs to readers and to authors, and as long as publisher revenue targets are met, the work is OA for everyone.
  • S2O is ideal for libraries because it gives the library flexibility in continuing to subscribe only to the journals they want (i.e. there isn’t typically bundling of multiple subscriptions together).
  • The incentives to participate early in S2O make the free-rider problem less of an issue.
  • Diamond OA is an ideal model, but will really require centralized infrastructure and funding to make it more viable on a large scale.

We also discussed some things we wish were different:

  • There is lots of confusion related to the proliferation of business models. We wish there was a relatively simple way to talk about this with our university community.
  • Some of the Read & Publish deals require a lot of workflow help – for instance, in approving discounts or APCs for individual authors.
  • Read & Publish deals are sometimes only available for an entire database or an entire publisher’s output. This makes it more expensive and harder to customize.
  • Many Read & Publish deals include caps on the amount of OA articles from a given institution. This creates an unfair situation for authors who publish later in the fiscal year.
  • For authors who want to comply with federal funding agency policies, the S2O model might be a bit confusing. Authors likely wouldn’t know if their article would be OA right at the time of publication; they’d need to wait to find out if that year’s revenue target is met. It’s likely that authors publishing in S2O journals will need to use self-archiving in a disciplinary or institutional repository to ensure OA.

If you are interested in reading more, here are some selected resources (not comprehensive):

  • Borrego, A. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1558
  • Acharjee, A., & Acharjee, P. (2024). Democratizing Knowledge or Closing Gates? A Critical Examination of Article-Processing Charges. In P.B. Joshi, P.P. Churi, & M. Pandey (Eds.), Scientific Publishing Ecosystem. p. 79-101. Springer, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4_5 
  • Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2019). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1262 
  • Mellins-Cohen, T. (2024). Classifying Open Access Business Models. Insights 37. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/331 
  • Science Europe. (n.d.). Diamond Open Access. Retrieved October 21, 2024. https://scienceeurope.org/our-priorities/open-science/diamond-open-access/ 
  • OABooks (2024). Business models for OA book publishing. https://oabooks-toolkit.org/lifecycle/article/10432084-business-models-for-open-access-book-publishing 

Primary Sidebar

Archives

  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013

Your Twitter Feed

Tweets by Texas ScholarWorks

Recent Posts

  • Top downloads from Texas ScholarWorks – June 2025
  • UT Libraries and TDL supporting new OA journal
  • Affordable Education Champion Profile: Dr. Jonathan Perry
  • Top downloads from Texas ScholarWorks – May 2025
  • Top downloads from Texas ScholarWorks – April 2025

Footer

LINKS SECTION ONE

Links or other information
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link

LINKS SECTION TWO

Links or other information
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link

LINKS SECTION THREE

Links or other information
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
Link
ITS

Address Link
Austin, TX 78712
512-555-5555
Email Address Here

Donate

        

UT Home | Emergency Information | Site Policies | Web Accessibility | Web Privacy | Adobe Reader

© The University of Texas at Austin 2025