Abbreviations

[- pre] = positioning after the verb

[+ pre] = positioning before the verb

[+/- anim] = animate / inanimate

[ɐ] = the vowel in dieser

[ǝ] = the vowel in diese

+/- EI = with / without Explicit Information

+/- P = with / without Prosody

ABX = A task of perception

BDOTS = Bootstrapped Differences of Time Series

HVPT = High Variability Phonetic Training

L1 = First Language

L2 = Second Language

OVS = Object First

PI = Processing Instruction

SVO = Subject First

TTAT  = Trials to Accuracy Threshold

References

Barrios, S. L., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2020). Second language learning of phonological alternations with and without orthographic input: Evidence from the acquisition of a German-like voicing alternation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(3), 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000077

Barriuso, T. A., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2018). High Variability Phonetic Training as a Bridge From Research to Practice. The CATESOL Journal, 30, 177.

Bates, E. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press. http://philpapers.org/rec/BATFAT-3

Behney, J., Spinner, P., Gass, S. M., & Valmori, L. (2017). The L2 acquisition of Italian tense. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (1st ed., pp. 89–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399027-5

Culman, H., Henry, N., & VanPatten, B. (2009). The role of explicit information in instructed SLA: An on-line study with Processing Instruction and German accusative case inflections. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42(1), 19–31.

DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, A., Ravid, D., & Shi, M. (2017). The role of salience in the acquisition of Hebrew as a second language: Interaction with age of acquisition. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp. 131–146). Routledge.

Durham, K., Hayes-Harb, R., Barrios, S., & Showalter, C. E. (2016). The influence of various visual input types on L2 learners’ memory for phonological forms of newly-learned words. In J. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 98–107). Iowa State University.

Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015

Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.11.002

Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2014). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000436

Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in Processing Instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467

Field, J. (2008). Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on? TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00139.x

Gass, S. M., Spinner, P., & Behney, J. (Eds.). (2017). Salience in second language acquisition. Routledge.

Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50.

Grünloh, T. (2011). Intonation in language acquisition: Evidence from German [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Cologne.

Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.3115/1073336.1073357

Hayes-Harb, R., & Hacking, J. (2015). The influence of written stress marks on native english speakers’ acquisition of russian lexical stress contrasts: Slavic & east european journal. Slavic & East European Journal, 59(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.30851/59.1.005

Henry, N. (2022a). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition and processing of grammatical gender in German. Language Teaching Research, 13621688221096368. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221096368

Henry, N. (2022b). The offline and online effects of processing instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43, 945–971.

Henry, N. (2023a). Reevaluating trials to criterion as a measure in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(5), 1481–1505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000165

Henry, N. (2023b). The additive use of prosody and morphosyntax in L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(2), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000092

Henry, N., Culman, H., & VanPatten, B. (2009). More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(04), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990027

Henry, N., Jackson, C. N., & DiMidio, J. (2017). The role of prosody and explicit instruction in Processing Instruction. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 1–21.

Henry, N., Jackson, C. N., & Hopp, H. (2022). Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German. Second Language Research, 38(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320963151

Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369–397.

Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004

Hopp, H. (2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0014

Jackson, C. N. (2008). Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 58(4), 875–909.

Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006

Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313480154

Simoens, H., Housen, A., & De Cuypere, L. (2017). The effect of perceptual salience on processing L2 inflectional morphology. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp. 107–130). Routledge.

Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Target-ing second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744–765. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765

Thomson, R. I. (2018). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho

VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495–510.

Weber, A., Braun, B., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). Finding referents in time: Eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech, 49(3), 367–392.