UT Shield

Take5 | Office of Academic Technology | University of Texas at Austin

The University of Texas at Austin Academic Affairs Homepage

Autonomy

, Filed Under: Autonomy, engagement, Learning Outcomes, Metacognition, Motivation, Retrieval

1 Simple Way to Capture Students’ Attention…with Learning Outcomes

(3 1/2 minute read) 

How often do you return to your learning outcomes with your students throughout a semester? Many of us spend a tremendous amount of energy (sometimes decades!) developing our learning outcomes for our syllabi at the launch of a course. However,  we never revisit them again until the following year during syllabus prep time. Such negligence of our outcomes throughout a course is unfortunate because they can be powerful drivers of learning throughout the semester. 

Capture Attention at the Start of Class with a Learning Outcome Slider 

Learning outcomes are so important to me that I use them to launch every class meeting and “grab” students’ attention. To do this, I open each class with a Learning Outcome Slider. I designed the Learning Outcome Slider activity to help me create an engagement habit with students at the start of the pandemic, and I’ve maintained it since. Continue Reading 1 Simple Way to Capture Students’ Attention…with Learning Outcomes

, Filed Under: Asynchronous Learning, Autonomy, Canvas, Digital Pedagogy, Hybrid Teaching, Motivation, Online Teaching, Retrieval, Self-determination theory, Synchronous Learning

A framework for asynchronous learning

In my classroom at The University of Texas at Austin, I teach a relatively new class called Design Pedagogy – aka the methods and practice of teaching design. We have a mix of MFA design students and students pursuing graduate degrees in higher education. According to the University catalog, all students are supposed to spend six hours engaged in “asynchronous learning” outside of class, in addition to the three hours we spend together during pre-scheduled class time.  

What is asynchronous learning? 

Time (not duration) and place of learning are the units of analysis for asynchronous instruction. Students have the autonomy to choose when they learn and where they learn. Synchronous learning, on the other hand, is learning that happens at a predetermined, specific time and place – with no choice. Here’s a quick contrasting case explaining the differences.

What are the benefits of asynchronous learning? 

There are several, however, in my opinion, the biggest benefit is that asynchronous learning affords autonomy, and more specifically autonomy of choice. In the case of learning – students can choose when to learn, where to learn, and often how (the path they will follow, long they will spend on a task, etc). Autonomy is a potent motivator of human behavior and has a host of benefits including greater well-being and academic achievement in schools ( Deci et al. (1991).

Asynchronous learning is not new.

Asynchronous learning is a newish phrase for an age-old concept. I was born and raised in Las Vegas, so I always like a friendly bet. And, I would wager that everyone reading this post and everyone they know, and everyone they know has engaged in substantial asynchronous learning throughout their lives vis a viz doing homework. 

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) defines homework as “schoolwork assigned to a pupil to be done outside lesson time (typically at home). In extended use: An assignment or exercise to be completed in one’s own time.” Homework is the most basic form of asynchronous learning. 

Asynchronous learning needs as much attention as synchronous learning. 

For most college students, homework is about as enjoyable as a plate of boiled Brussel sprouts. Homework is generally something that you do on your own, and it is most often a hoop to jump through. Performance orientated students won’t do it unless it counts toward a grade, and mastery orientated students need more than a few boxes to tick off (see Svinicki, 2005). Continue Reading A framework for asynchronous learning

×