August 10, 2015, Filed Under: 2015, cancer, learning, reflectionsFinal Reflection on Emperor and Mindset So ten weeks have gone by, and I’ve finally completed the books that have followed us throughout the process. Each of them gave us a lot to think about in terms of our research, our growth throughout this experience, and what we should do moving forward. Few of the REU students actually did the readings beyond what was originally assigned at the beginning of the summer, later getting inundated with the work they needed to do to contribute to their labs, but they did extract many of the key points from both books early on. Being given a 600 and a 200 page book to finish seemed intimidating, but both did an excellent job of framing the type of work we were doing within the context of both how our understanding of cancer has changed and how our understanding of ourselves has changed. Emperor Book Cover The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer by Siddharta Mukherjee The Emperor book, by Dr. Mukherjee, brought to the forefront of our minds the kind of change that cancer research can facilitate. Cancer is an umbrella term for a vast array of related disease where cells grow uncontrollably, but different cancers have different biomarkers and needs to be treated in different ways. If there was a single thing that stuck out to me by the end, it was how easily accessible this book makes understanding how cancer and our understanding of it has developed over time. From ancient Egypt to the modern world, Dr. Mukherjee’s story showcases just how important cancer research is, as well as dealing with the failures that have plagued research into the diseases for centuries. The biography illustrates a record of false hope and loss, but also of innovation, determination, and a far more cautious hope that paves a path for future advances against cancer and inspires us to keep on fighting. It reminds us that the research we do at the frontier of cancer research is significant and can improve the lives of many. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success by Carol Dweck As was mentioned in an earlier blog post, we joked about the “growth mindset” while improving ourselves based on the general idea, and the rest of the book largely tackles the growth mindset from different angles. Dr. Dweck discusses how mindsets affect how we can approach everything in life, how certain mindsets beget success, how mindsets are developed and how teams and organizations benefit from effective mindsets. Notably, she relates these ideas to your interactions with others in a way that anyone can understand, dependent on whatever role they normally play, by including situations involving real people facing reasonable problems. Of course, the final chapter gives direction to how one can actually change mindsets, as the growth mindset is based on the belief in change. Facing the frightening reality of change and failure along every step is imperative to success, especially in academia, where you search for a relevant research question that you have the training to address, where your papers will be rejected, and where your projects will often fail to come to fruition. Dr. Dweck weaves a narrative about the benefits of change throughout her book, and I feel that learning to actively make change a part of my life will only help me in the future. -Sreyesh Rishi Satpathy, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
July 23, 2015, Filed Under: 2015, reflections, researchResearch Community Source: NBC As individuals each day we are faced with a task that may be new or carried on from the past. We may believe the approaches we take are the best, or are the only ones. We may believe that with our knowledge and commitment we can solve anything by ourselves. The fact of the matter is that we shouldn’t, we need others in order to accomplish goals. The importance of a research community is that networking together and communicating with one another may give solutions and ideas to help us progress in the various fields of research. In order to grow and develop our way of thinking, through listening and networking with others we can be shown a different perspective that may be much more optimal than our own approaches. A research community should be comprised of researchers that are willing to listen and consider other thoughts, contribute what they can when possible, uniting as one in order to further progress towards a solution. As individuals we have our own methods and try to do all of the work by ourselves, or through a community of researchers we can work together and instead of working hard, we work smart. Ultimately, being open to a community of researchers rather than having an individualistic mind will allow many opportunities for understanding and analyzing the problem at hand. Research shouldn’t necessarily be about the individual trying to solve the problem just for recognition, we must not forget of what the real problem is at hand. Lastly, a strong community and an understanding one is why and how the advances in technology or medicine have been made, through a team, and more than one person. Matthew Vasquez, PVAMU
July 15, 2015, Filed Under: 2015, cancer, learning, reflections, researchResearch and Reading Research Accomplishments So Far I work with Dr. Jeanne Stachowiak, who studies lipids membranes. For the first month or so, my research was solely devoted to helping their research on clathrin’s effect on vesicle budding. I spent a lot of time making small unilamellar vesicles and preparing SUPER Templates for fission experiments. Recently, I have come up with a project of my own, under Dr. Stachowiak and my graduate student mentor’s guidance, to investigate and reduce the interactions between amyloid-β protein, which plays a role in the onset of Alzheimer’s, and rafts GM1, a glycolipid found in the cell membranes of neurons. I am currently finishing the stage of gathering the necessary materials and planning the project. In the meantime, I am learning how to make giant unilamellar vesicles. Reflection on The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer by Siddharta Mukherjee Source: Wikipedia As someone who loves history significantly more than your average engineer, something that struck me was how for the past two centuries, the disease which would make the top of medicine’s Most Wanted list fit the personality of the century so well. The nineteenth century was a doom-and-gloom time characterized by Victorian literature, in which people let their emotions consume them and even kill them if it’s negative enough. Lots of books come to mind, but one is Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818), three quarters of which is just Dr. Frankenstein’s (or, when Shelley decides to mix it up, the monster himself) incessant whining and overreacting about how ugly his creation is. Wuthering Heights (1847) also features a whole lot of sulking. Art in the 1800s tended to be about consuming emotions which is fitting, because tuberculosis–the most notorious killer of the day–was called consumption in the 1800s and killed you slowly. In the 1900’s, cancer became the next frontier in medicine in the developed world. The West went from a world of consumption to consumers, with excesses everywhere, from the production line to the home. Just consider the clothes you have in your closet compared to the clothing you need. The second half of the 20th century played host to a global war that was won not by violence but merely by determining whose factories could churn out more weapons faster. Similarly, cancer is a disease that, put simply, is the overproduction of cells. A person’s cancer cells are their own cells whose cell division controls have broken, so they reproduce out of control. The cancerous cells proliferate to the thousands and millions, and then they kill the organism by diverting resources from healthy tissue and over consuming those resources. Put differently, they take time for leisure, another hallmark of the twentieth century. Reflection on Mindset by Carol Dweck Mindset outlines the two possible ways one can respond to failure: rejection, or setback. Those with the fixed mindset are the ones who give up after failure because there’s no point in trying; they make excuses, define themselves by a single test score, and coast on natural talent and avoid practice. Those with the growth mindset do the opposite: they recognize their weaknesses, they try to learn from their mistakes, they know failure is a prerequisite to success more often than not, and they recognize that there is always room for improvement. I am glad that we read this book as a group. Dweck makes a convincing argument, but as scientists we all started out a little skeptical. Because it was an early shared experience, we in the REU made jokes about the growth mindset. If someone failed or was bad at something, or if we wanted to try something new, we’d say, “growth mindset!” We still make those jokes, but these jokes changed our minds subconsciously, so we played the biggest role in creating our own growth mindset in the REU group. Sean Thomas, University of South Carolina