• About
  • Scholars
  • RESEARCH
  • Events
  • Opinions
  • SUPPORT
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
UT Shield
Empct logo
  • About
  • Scholars
  • RESEARCH
  • Events
    • PAST EVENTS
    • CONFERENCES
  • Opinions
  • SUPPORT

Working Paper

March 5, 2025, Filed Under: Working Paper

Fast and Slow Technological Transitions

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2025-02
74 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Adão, Rodrigo, Martin Beraja, and Nitya Pandalai-Nayar, “Fast and Slow Technological Transitions”, February 2024

Rodrigo Adãoy
Booth School of Business

Martin Berajaz
MIT

Nitya Pandalai-Nayar
University of Texas at Austin


Abstract
Do economies adjust slowly to certain technological innovations and more rapidly to others?
We argue that the adjustment is slower when innovations mainly benefit production
activities requiring skills which are more different from those used in the rest of the economy.
The reason is that, when such skill specificity is stronger, the adjustment of labor markets
is driven less by the fast reallocation of older incumbent workers and more by the gradual
entry of younger generations to the benefitted activities. We begin by documenting that the
U.S. labor market adjusted differently to the arrival of Information & Communications Technologies
(ICT) in the late twentieth century than it did to innovations in manufacturing at the
beginning of that century. We then build an overlapping generations model of technological
transitions. It allows us to sharply characterize the effects of skill specificity on equilibrium
dynamics, match the evidence in a parsimonious way, and study its welfare implications. We
show that stronger skill specificity helps to explain why the ICT transition was more unequal
and slower, driven entirely by the gradual entry of younger generations who accrued more of
the welfare gains from ICT innovations.

February 20, 2025, Filed Under: Working Paper

How Costly Are Business Cycle Volatility and Inflation? A Vox Populi Approach

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2025-01
66 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Georgarakos, Dimitris, Kwang Hwan Kim, Olivier Coibion, Myungkyu Shim, Myunghwan Andrew Lee, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Geoff Kenny, Seowoo Han, and Michael Weber, “How Costly Are Business Cycle Volatility and Inflation? A Vox Populi Approach”, February 2025.

Dimitris Georgarakos
European Central Bank & CEPR

Kwang Hwan Kim
Yonsei University

Olivier Coibion
UT Austin & NBER

Myungkyu Shim
Yonsei University

Myunghwan Andrew Lee
New York University

Yuriy Gorodnichenko
UC Berkeley, CEPR, & NBER

Geoff Kenny
European Central Bank

Seowoo Han
Yonsei University

Michael Weber
Chicago Booth, CEPR, & NBER


Abstract
Using surveys of households across thirteen countries, we study how much individuals would be willing to pay to eliminate business cycles. These direct estimates are much higher than traditional measures following Lucas (2003): on average, households would be prepared to sacrifice around 5-6% of their lifetime consumption to eliminate business cycle fluctuations. A similar result holds for inflation: to bring inflation to their desired rate, individuals would be willing to sacrifice around 5% of their consumption. Willingness to pay to eliminate business cycles and inflation is generally higher for those whose consumption is more pro-cyclical, those who are more uncertain about the economic outlook, and those who live in countries with greater historical volatility. 

October 25, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Weathering the Storm: Supply Chains and Climate Risk

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-08
82 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Castro-Vencenzi, Juanma, Gaurav Khanna, Nicolas Morales, and Nitya Pandalai-Nayar , “Weathering the Storm: Supply Chains and Climate Risk” October, 2024

Juanma Castro-Vincenzi
University of Chicago

Gaurav Khanna
University of California, San Diego

Nicolas Morales
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Nitya Pandalai-Nayar
University of Texas at Austin and NBER


Abstract
We characterize how firms structure supply chains under climate risk. Using new data on the universe of firm-to-firm transactions from an Indian state, we show that firms diversify sourcing locations, and that suppliers exposed to climate risk charge lower prices. We develop a general equilibrium spatial model of firm input sourcing under climate risk. Firms diversify identical inputs from suppliers across space, trading off the probability of climate disruptions against higher input costs. We quantify the model using data on 271 Indian regions. Wages are inversely correlated with sourcing risk, giving rise to a cost minimization-resilience tradeoff. Supply chain diversification unambiguously reduces real wage volatility, but ambiguously affects their levels, as diversification may come with high input costs. While diversification mitigates climate risk, it exacerbates the distributional consequences of climate change by reducing wages in regions prone to frequent shocks.

October 25, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Playing with blocs: Quantifying decoupling

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-07
41 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Bonadio,Barthélémy, Zhen Huo, Elliot Kang, Andrei A. Levchenko, Nitya Pandalai-Nayar, Hiroshi Toma, and Petia Topalova, “Playing with blocs: Quantifying decoupling” October, 2024

Barthélémy Bonadio
Andrei A. Levchenko
Petia Topalova

Zhen Huo
Nitya Pandalai-Nayar

Elliot Kang
Hiroshi Toma


Abstract
We adopt a data-driven approach to measure trade fragmentation over the period 2015-2023. We assign countries to the US bloc, the China bloc, or to an unaligned group based on whether their trade costs with the US and China increased or decreased over this period. We find that the US bloc and the China bloc each contain roughly a quarter of the countries in the world, with about half the countries remaining unaligned. However, we also find that as cross-bloc trade costs increased, within-bloc trade costs fell. We use a quantitative model to compute the real income effects of this reconfiguration of the global trade costs. The median country in the world, and the median country within each bloc, has 0.4-0.6% higher real income as a result of the observed decoupling, contrary to the widespread belief that fragmentation has been welfare-reducing. Finally, we find a modest amount of bloc misalignment: the median country in the US bloc would actually be better off in the China bloc, and vice versa. These results suggest that trade decoupling does not always follow trade-driven economic interests.

October 25, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Dynamic Models, New Gains from Trade?

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-09
36 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Boehm, Christoph E., Andrei A. Levchenko, Nitya Pandalai-Nayar, and Hiroshi Toma, ” Dynamic Models, New Gains from Trade?” October, 2024

Christoph E. Boehm
University of Texas at Austin and NBER

Andrei A. Levchenko
University of Michigan NBER and CEPR

Nitya Pandalai-Nayar
University of Texas at Austin and NBER

Hiroshi Toma
University of Michigan


Abstract
Yes. We state closed-form expressions for steady state gains from trade that apply in a class of dynamic trade models that includes dynamic versions of the Krugman (1980), Melitz (2003), and customer capital (e.g., Arkolakis, 2010) models. The gains are a function of the domestic trade share and the long-run elasticity of trade with respect to iceberg trade costs, similar to Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodríguez-Clare (2012). In contrast to static settings, in a dynamic world this long-run elasticity cannot be estimated in one step by relying on tariff variation as shifters of trade costs. We show, instead, that this object can be recovered by combining two tariff elasticity estimates: the long- and the short-run. Thus, the short-run tariff elasticity indirectly enters the formula for the steady state gains from trade. Our main substantive finding is that the gains from trade are large. They depend crucially on the short-run tariff elasticity, and can be arbitrarily large even if the long-run tariff elasticity is high. Accounting for the transition path has a minor impact on the magnitude of the gains from trade, relative to simply comparing steady states.

October 25, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Concentration, Market Power, and Misallocation: The Role of Endogenous Customer Acquisition

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-06
99 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Afrouzi, Hassan, Andres Drenik, and Ryan Kim, “Concentration, Market Power, and Misallocation: The Role of Endogenous Customer Acquisition” October, 2024

Hassan Afrouzi
Columbia University and NBER

Andres Drenik
The University of Texas at Austin

Ryan Kim
Johns Hopkins University


Abstract
This paper explores how different margins of market share are related to markups. Using merged microdata on producers and consumers, we document that a firm’s market share is mainly related to its number of customers, while its price-cost markup is associated only with its average sales per customer. We develop a new model that reflects this empirical evidence and the endogenous nature of customer acquisition. When calibrated, this model predicts a higher degree of markup dispersion, which suggests greater efficiency losses due to customer misallocation. An analysis of the efficient allocation in this model reveals that compared with the equilibrium, aggregate TFP and output are 10.8% and 14% higher, respectively.

October 25, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Monetary Policy without Moving Interest Rates: The Fed Non-Yield Shock

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-05
79 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Boehm, Christoph E, and T. Niklas Kroner, “Monetary Policy without Moving Interest Rates: The Fed Non-Yield Shock” September, 2024

Christoph E. Boehm
UT Austin and NBER

T. Niklas Kroner
Federal Reserve Board


Abstract
Existing high-frequency monetary policy shocks explain surprisingly little variation in stock prices and exchange rates around FOMC announcements. Further, both of these asset classes display heightened volatility relative to non announcement times. We use a heteroskedasticity-based procedure to estimate a “Fed non-yield shock”, which is orthogonal to yield changes and is identified from excess volatility in the S&P 500 and various dollar exchange rates. A positive non-yield shock raises stock prices in the U.S. and around the globe, and depreciates the dollar against all major currencies. The non-yield shock is essentially uncorrelated with previous monetary policy shocks and its effects are large in comparison. Its strong effects on the VIX and other risk-related measures point towards a dominant risk premium channel. We show that the non-yield shock can be related to Fed communications and that its existence has implications for the identification of structural monetary policy shocks.

October 24, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Relative-Price Changes as Aggregate Supply Shocks Revisited: Theory and Evidence

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-04
56 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Afrouzi, Hassan, Saroj Bhattarai, and Edson Wu, “Relative-Price Changes as Aggregate Supply Shocks Revisited: Theory and Evidence” October, 2024

Hassan Afrouzi
Columbia University and NBER

Saroj Bhattarai
University of Texas at Austin

Edson Wu
University of Texas at Austin


Abstract
We provide theory and evidence that relative price shocks can cause aggregate inflation and act as aggregate supply shocks. Empirically, we show that exogenous positive energy price shocks have a positive impact not only on headline but also on U.S. core inflation while depressing U.S. real activity. In a two-sector monetary model with upstream and downstream sectors and heterogeneous price stickiness, we analytically characterize how upstream shocks propagate to prices. Using panel IV local projections, we show that the responsiveness of sectoral PCE prices to energy price shocks is in line with model predictions. Motivated by post-COVID inflation in the U.S., a model experiment shows that a one-time relative price shock generates persistent movements in headline and core inflation similar to those observed in the data, even in the absence of aggregate slack. The model also emphasizes that monetary policy stance plays an important role in propagation of such shocks.

October 24, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

Illiquid Lemon Markets and the Macroeconomy

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-03
106 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Bierdel, Aimé, Andres Drenik, Juan Herreño, and Pablo Ottonello, “Illiquid Lemon Markets and the Macroeconomy” October, 2024

Aimé Bierdel
Columbia University

Andres Drenik
UT Austin

Juan Herreño
UC San Diego

Pablo Ottonello
University of Maryland and NBER


Abstract
We study the macroeconomic implications of asymmetric information in capital markets. We build a quantitative capital-accumulation model in which capital is traded in illiquid markets, with sellers having more information about capital quality than buyers. Asymmetric information distorts the terms of trade for sellers of high-quality capital, who list higher prices and are willing to accept lower trading probabilities to signal their type. Led by the model’s predictions, we measure the distortions from asymmetric information by studying the relationship between listed prices and trading probabilities in a unique dataset of individual capital units listed for trade. By combining the empirical measurement with the model, we show that information asymmetries can play a quantitatively large role during economic crises when the degree of asymmetric information deteriorates.

October 24, 2024, Filed Under: Working Paper

The Inflation Attention Threshold and Inflation Surgers

EMPCT Working Paper Series No. 2024-02
72 pages | PDF Download | PDF in Browser


Citation:
Pfäuti, Oliver, “The Inflation Attention Threshold and Inflation Surges” October, 2024.

Oliver Pfäuti
The University of Texas at Austin


Abstract
At the outbreak of the recent inflation surge, the public’s attention to inflation was low but increased quickly once inflation started to rise. In this paper, I quantify when and by how much the public’s attention to inflation changes, and derive the macroeconomic implications of these attention changes. I estimate an attention threshold at an inflation rate of about 4%,and that attention doubles when inflation exceeds this threshold. Adverse supply shocks become more inflationary in times of high attention, and the increase in people’s attention to inflation in 2021 accounts for half of the subsequent supply-driven inflation. I develop a model accounting for the attention threshold and show that shocks that are usually short lived lead to a persistent surge in inflation if they induce an increase in people’s attention. The attention threshold further lengthens the last mile of disinflation after an inflation surge, and leads to an asymmetry in the dynamics of inflation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Event Calendar

  • Spring 2026 Macro Conference

    April 23, 2026 - April 24, 2026  
    Legacy Events Center, CBA 3.202

    The Spring Macro Conference, co-hosted with the McCombs School of Business, will take place on April 23–24, 2026. This annual event will feature 12 invited speakers and will attract leading scholars from across the world, expanding UT Austin’s academic reach, creating opportunities for faculty and student engagement, and solidifying The University of Texas at Austin’s reputation as a hub for cutting-edge macroeconomic research.

    Add to Google Calendar

  • CMT Expectations Conference

    May 21, 2026
    Glickman Conference Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Rm 1.302B

    EMPCT is pleased to announce that we will be hosting the inaugural California-Michigan-Texas (CMT) Conference on Expectations and Behavior at UT Austin on May 21, 2026. This conference, co-organized by the University of Michigan, UC Berkeley, and UT Austin, will rotate across institutions, beginning this year with UT Austin. We are delighted to welcome Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard) as the keynote speaker. 

    Add to Google Calendar

CONTACT US

Have a question? Click on the link below.
Contact Us

Footer

2225 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712
Mail Stop C3100

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Twitter

UT Home | Emergency Information | Site Policies | Web Accessibility | Web Privacy | Adobe Reader

© The University of Texas at Austin 2026