I just read a short article by an appellate judge who said that lawyers should write their briefs in plain English.
I am not trying to be smart or flippant or disrespectful—this judge means well. But appellate briefs do not need to be written in plain English and probably should not be written in plain English. I explained why here and here.
What this judge probably meant is that appellate briefs should be clear, direct, and as simple as possible given that their primary audience is a legally trained judge.
I think my reaction is connected to a sense that we diminish the value of plain English, the necessity (in some documents) of plain English, and the difficulty in producing plain English when we say, essentially, “every legal document should be in plain English.”
No.
Credit-card agreements, residential leases, employee handbooks, jury instructions—yes.
But not interoffice analytical legal memos. Not commercial contracts between sophisticated parties represented by counsel. And not appellate briefs.